salvation – Reformed Faith Insights

The Interwoven Tapestry of Scripture and the Faithful Response of Zacchaeus

Introduction: The Unity of Scripture

The Bible is not a collection of isolated stories but an intricately woven tapestry where every verse, chapter, and book connects to the whole. From Genesis to Revelation, God reveals His redemptive plan, showing His faithfulness, justice, and mercy throughout history. Scripture interprets Scripture—what is foreshadowed in the Old Testament finds fulfillment in the New, and what is revealed in the New illuminates the truths of the Old.

Jesus Himself affirmed this unity when He said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them” (Matthew 5:17). The prophecies, the laws, the wisdom literature, and the narratives all work together, revealing Christ as the centerpiece of God’s plan. Even passages that seem disparate are connected by deeper theological themes—covenant, redemption, faith, and the kingdom of God.

The Gospel accounts are no exception. They do not merely offer isolated stories about Jesus but instead build upon themes found throughout the entirety of Scripture. Two encounters in particular—the Rich Young Ruler (Luke 18:18-30) and Zacchaeus (Luke 19:1-10)—serve as powerful examples of this interconnectedness. In these parallel accounts, Jesus calls for the same kind of faith, yet only one man responds with the surrender and trust that God desires.

The Call to Surrender: The Rich Young Ruler and Zacchaeus

At first glance, the stories of the Rich Young Ruler and Zacchaeus seem to present two entirely different men. The Rich Young Ruler is a man of privilege, wealth, and religious devotion. He comes to Jesus, asking, “Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” (Luke 18:18). Zacchaeus, on the other hand, is a tax collector—a man despised by his fellow Jews, known for extortion and greed. And yet, these two men share a critical similarity: they are both wealthy, and they both have an opportunity to follow Christ.

Jesus’ response to the Rich Young Ruler is striking. He tells him to obey the commandments, and when the man insists he has done so since his youth, Jesus adds, “One thing you still lack. Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me” (Luke 18:22). The young man, though morally upright, walks away sorrowful, for he is unwilling to part with his wealth.

Contrast this with Zacchaeus. Unlike the Rich Young Ruler, Zacchaeus does not approach Jesus asking what he must do to inherit eternal life. Instead, he is so desperate to see Christ that he climbs a sycamore tree. When Jesus calls him down and declares that He will stay at his house, Zacchaeus responds immediately, saying, “Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor. And if I have defrauded anyone of anything, I restore it fourfold” (Luke 19:8).

Where the Rich Young Ruler hesitated and held onto his riches, Zacchaeus joyfully gave them away. Where one man walked away sad, the other leaped forward in faith. Both men were given the same test: to surrender their wealth in trust of Christ. But only Zacchaeus responded with the kind of faith Jesus desired.

The Hidden Longing for God in the Hearts of the Faithful

What made the difference? Why did Zacchaeus respond in faith while the Rich Young Ruler clung to his possessions? The answer lies in the hidden longing God places within the hearts of those who will respond to Him.

Throughout Scripture, we see this theme of a deep, inexpressible longing for God—an ache in the soul that cannot be satisfied by the things of this world. David expresses this longing in the Psalms:

“As the deer pants for streams of water, so my soul pants for you, my God.” (Psalm 42:1)

“Whom have I in heaven but you? And earth has nothing I desire besides you.” (Psalm 73:25)

This longing is the work of the Holy Spirit, drawing men and women to God. Zacchaeus, though steeped in wealth and sin, had this yearning hidden in his heart. He climbed the tree not just to see Jesus, but because something inside of him was desperate for something more. When Christ called his name, it was as if the floodgates opened. His response was not one of reluctant duty but of overwhelming joy. He had found what his heart truly desired.

The Rich Young Ruler, on the other hand, did not recognize this longing—or rather, he allowed his worldly wealth to drown it out. He wanted eternal life, but not enough to let go of the things that he thought sustained him. His riches had become his god, and in the end, he walked away because his heart was not ready to surrender to the true God.

God’s Revelation Through Scripture and in Our Hearts

God hides this longing within the hearts of the faithful, but He also reveals it to us through His Word. Scripture does not merely tell stories; it speaks directly to our hearts, awakening in us a desire for something beyond this world.

Jesus Himself spoke of this mystery when He said:

“The kingdom of heaven is like treasure hidden in a field, which a man found and covered up. Then in his joy he goes and sells all that he has and buys that field.” (Matthew 13:44)

The faithful recognize this treasure when they encounter it. Zacchaeus did. He saw that following Christ was worth more than all the riches he had accumulated. His joy was not in what he had to give up, but in what he had gained—Christ Himself.

This is the pattern we see throughout Scripture. Abraham left his homeland to follow God’s promise. Moses left the riches of Egypt to lead God’s people. Paul considered everything he had as “rubbish” compared to knowing Christ (Philippians 3:8). These men responded to the hidden longing in their hearts—a longing placed there by God and revealed through His Word.

Conclusion: Our Response to the Call

The stories of the Rich Young Ruler and Zacchaeus are not just historical accounts—they are mirrors that reflect our own spiritual condition. When God calls us to follow Him, do we respond with faith, like Zacchaeus, or do we walk away sorrowful, like the Rich Young Ruler?

God has placed in each of us a longing for Himself. Some recognize it and respond; others suppress it, distracted by the temporary treasures of this world. Yet through Scripture, He continually calls us to Himself, awakening the desire for something greater—something eternal.

Zacchaeus’ response to Jesus was not just about giving away wealth. It was about recognizing that Christ was worth more. His heart had been stirred long before he climbed the sycamore tree, and when Jesus called his name, he knew there was only one answer: joyfully surrendering everything to follow his Savior.

May we, too, hear the call of Christ and respond with faith, for He is the treasure our hearts were made for.

The Law and the Gospel: The Fulfillment of Justice and Love in Christ

Humanity stands before a holy God with a deep and undeniable need—a need that can only be fulfilled in Christ. The law of God, given as a revelation of His perfect righteousness, serves as both a mirror and a tutor. It reveals the standard of divine perfection and, at the same time, exposes the depths of our sin and inability to meet it. The law is not merely a set of external rules, but a revelation of God’s holy character, which convicts our hearts, minds, and souls.

The Law: A Mirror to the Soul

When God gave the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:1-17), He was not just giving behavioral guidelines, but revealing the perfect moral standard by which all humanity would be judged. The law goes beyond external actions and reaches into the very thoughts and intentions of the heart. Jesus affirmed this when He said:

“You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.’ But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment…” (Matthew 5:21-22)

“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” (Matthew 5:27-28)

The law is spiritual. It does not merely prohibit outward sins but judges the very thoughts and inclinations of the heart. The Apostle Paul himself, once a proud Pharisee, came to understand the crushing weight of the law when he wrote:

“Yet if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin. For I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, ‘You shall not covet.’” (Romans 7:7)

God’s law is relentless. It does not allow us to justify ourselves by comparing ourselves to others or by pointing to our good deeds. It condemns everyone under sin:

“For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” (Romans 3:23)

The Gospel: Love and Justice Fulfilled in Christ

If the law shows us our guilt, then the Gospel shows us our hope. The law demands righteousness, and where we fail, it demands justice. Yet God, in His infinite mercy, did not leave us to perish under the weight of our guilt. Instead, He provided a way—a way that both satisfies justice and demonstrates the greatest love imaginable.

At the heart of the Gospel is the person and work of Jesus Christ. He did what no one else could do: He lived a perfect, sinless life, completely fulfilling the demands of the law (Matthew 5:17). And yet, in love, He willingly took upon Himself the punishment that we deserved.

“But God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” (Romans 5:8)

At the cross, divine justice and divine love met. The justice of God demanded that sin be punished, but the love of God provided a substitute—Jesus Christ, the righteous one.

“For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.” (2 Corinthians 5:21)

Christ bore the wrath of God, satisfying the demands of divine justice so that we, guilty sinners, might be reconciled to the Father. The full penalty of sin was paid:

“Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us—for it is written, ‘Cursed is everyone who is hanged on a tree.'” (Galatians 3:13)

Yet the story does not end with the cross. Jesus – bodily – rose from the grave, demonstrating that His sacrifice was accepted and that death had been defeated (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). Now, through Him, we are invited to come home to the Father, not as condemned sinners, but as beloved children.

The Call: Come to Christ

The Gospel is not merely an abstract truth—it is an invitation. It calls for a response. Jesus’ arms are open to all who will come:

“Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.” (Matthew 11:28)

There is no sin too great, no heart too hardened, that He cannot redeem. The blood of Christ cleanses all who repent and believe in Him:

“If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” (1 John 1:9)

How, then, shall we respond? The Bible is clear:

“If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” (Romans 10:9)

There is no work you must perform, no penance you must endure. Salvation is a free gift:

“For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9)

Today, the invitation stands. The Father calls you home. Christ has paid the price. Justice has been satisfied. Love has been displayed.

Will you turn from your sin and trust in Christ? Will you surrender your life to Him as Lord and Savior? There is no greater decision, no greater joy, and no greater assurance than to be reconciled to God through Jesus Christ. Come to Him today.

Venmo: @reformedfaithinsights

The Doctrine of Imputation: A Biblical and Confessional Defense Against Infused Righteousness

Introduction

The doctrine of justification is central to the Christian faith. The Reformers, following Scripture, upheld imputation—the teaching that Christ’s righteousness is credited to the believer by faith alone. In contrast, the Roman Catholic Church teaches infused righteousness, which asserts that righteousness is gradually imparted to the believer, making him inherently just before God. The difference is not trivial; it is the dividing line between the gospel of grace and a system of works-based righteousness.

This article will affirm the doctrine of imputation as taught in Scripture and the Reformed confessions while refuting the doctrine of infused righteousness. We will also draw upon the wisdom of the Puritans, who forcefully defended the biblical doctrine of justification against its corruptions.

The Biblical Basis for Imputation

The doctrine of imputation teaches that our sins were imputed to Christ and His righteousness is imputed to us through faith. This concept is seen throughout Scripture:

Adam’s Sin Imputed to Humanity – Romans 5:12-19 teaches that Adam’s sin brought condemnation to all men. Just as Adam’s sin is imputed to us, Christ’s righteousness is imputed to believers: “For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.” (Romans 5:19)
Our Sins Imputed to Christ – Isaiah 53:6 and 2 Corinthians 5:21 demonstrate that Christ bore our sins, not as an inherent sinner, but as our substitute: “For He hath made Him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him.” (2 Corinthians 5:21)
Christ’s Righteousness Imputed to Believers – Romans 4:3-6 emphasizes that righteousness is reckoned (credited) to believers by faith, not by works: “Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.” (Romans 4:3)

Imputation stands in stark contrast to infused righteousness. Infusion teaches that righteousness is poured into the believer through sacraments, particularly baptism and penance, making the person inherently righteous. This teaching ultimately reintroduces works into justification and denies the sufficiency of Christ’s finished work.

The Reformed Confessions on Imputation

The historic Reformed confessions uniformly reject infused righteousness and affirm imputation. Consider the following:

The Westminster Confession of Faith (1647)

The Westminster Confession of Faith (WCF) clearly affirms imputation in Chapter 11, Section 1:

“Those whom God effectually calleth, He also freely justifieth: not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous; not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ’s sake alone; nor by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing the obedience and satisfaction of Christ unto them.”

This explicit rejection of infused righteousness aligns with biblical teaching and stands in opposition to the Council of Trent’s anathemas against justification by faith alone.

The Belgic Confession (1561)

Article 23 of the Belgic Confession likewise upholds imputation:

“We believe that our salvation consists in the remission of our sins for Jesus Christ’s sake, and that therein our righteousness before God is implied; as David and Paul teach us, declaring this to be the happiness of man, that God imputes righteousness to him without works.”

The Heidelberg Catechism (1563)

Question 60 of the Heidelberg Catechism beautifully articulates justification through imputation:

“God, without any merit of mine, of mere grace, grants and imputes to me the perfect satisfaction, righteousness, and holiness of Christ, as if I had never committed nor had any sin.”

The uniform testimony of the Reformed confessions is clear: righteousness is imputed, not infused.

The Puritan Defense of Imputation

The Puritans, as heirs of the Reformation, stood unwaveringly in defense of imputation. They recognized that any deviation from this doctrine leads to a perversion of the gospel.

John Owen (1616–1683)

John Owen, in The Doctrine of Justification by Faith, refutes the Roman Catholic view:

“The foundation of justification, on the part of God, is the imputation of the perfect righteousness, obedience, and satisfaction of Christ, in the stead of the law’s demand of perfect obedience on our part… The whole doctrine of the gospel is overturned by the assertion of an inherent righteousness in justification.”

Owen’s argument is clear: if righteousness is infused, then justification is no longer by faith alone. This leads to a works-based system contrary to the gospel.

Thomas Watson (1620–1686)

Watson, in A Body of Divinity, describes imputation as essential to salvation:

“Faith is said to be imputed to us for righteousness, not as our righteousness, but as the instrument whereby we receive Christ’s righteousness. It is not faith, as a grace, which justifies, but faith as it lays hold on Christ.”

This statement exposes a fatal flaw in infused righteousness—it makes faith a meritorious work rather than the means by which we receive Christ’s righteousness.

Richard Baxter (1615–1691)

Although Baxter is known for his neonomian leanings, he still affirmed the centrality of Christ’s righteousness:

“Christ’s righteousness is ours by imputation, not by infusion, else it were not his righteousness, but our own.”

Even within Puritanism, where some deviated on certain aspects of justification, imputation remained the cornerstone of Protestant soteriology.

The Theological and Practical Dangers of Infused Righteousness

Infused righteousness is not merely a theological error—it distorts the gospel in profound ways:

It Denies Justification by Faith Alone – By making righteousness something inherent rather than credited, it requires continual works to maintain justification.
It Leads to Assurance Based on Works – If righteousness is infused, the believer’s confidence before God rests on his own level of sanctification rather than on Christ’s finished work.
It Corrupts the Simplicity of the Gospel – Paul warned against any addition to the gospel in Galatians 1:8-9. The infusion model effectively reintroduces the works-righteousness that Paul condemned.

The Reformers rightly saw that infused righteousness was a return to the bondage of the law. As Martin Luther thundered:

“If the doctrine of justification is lost, the whole of Christian doctrine is lost.”

Conclusion

The biblical doctrine of justification rests on the imputation of Christ’s righteousness, not the infusion of inherent righteousness. The Scriptures, the Reformed confessions, and the Puritans stand in unison on this essential truth. Infused righteousness undermines the gospel by placing the believer’s standing before God on personal transformation rather than Christ’s finished work.

The choice is clear: we must stand with Scripture and the great cloud of witnesses who proclaimed, “The just shall live by faith” (Romans 1:17). To abandon imputation is to abandon grace itself. Let us, therefore, hold fast to this precious doctrine, for in it lies the only hope of sinners—full and free justification through Christ alone.